Re: [Gnumed-devel] Gnumed status

[Karsten Hilbert]

> I have not checked in the changes yet. The problems are related to setting
> parameters with {user,machine,cookie}=None and the different handling of 
> None in set and get (cfgDB).
Ah. I see. That's one area where more thought needs to be put
into. I TRIED to make the behaviour least surprising (which
isn't the same as "consistent across set/get") but that's just
me. Good to see that reviewed by others.

> This resulted in adding a new entry each time.
> this 
> is reproducible by the simple test already included in gmCfg.py (have a look
> at the
> entries it creates - it adds one new entry even for parameters that don?t
> change)
You mean like the one the name of which is generated randomly
?  =8-)

> I will check in the changes I need for the ConfigEditor within some days.
> Please be  patient as I?m just moving to a new flat and there won?t be much 
> time left
> to hack  gnumed for one or two weeks.
Sure.

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346