[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnumed-devel] Re: Gnumed-devel Digest, Vol 5, Issue 7
From: |
sjtan |
Subject: |
[Gnumed-devel] Re: Gnumed-devel Digest, Vol 5, Issue 7 |
Date: |
04 Apr 2003 12:54:07 +1000 |
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 21:54, address@hidden wrote:
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: interoperable gehr (Karsten Hilbert)
>
>
>
> > I was looking at some of the gehr stuff and at Fowler: has any authority
> > enumerated all the observation types, so that different systems share
> > the same identity of an observation type : e.g. observation type sex,
> > observation type age , observation type cholesterol level etc...
> > sex=1, age=2, chol_level=2832 , serum_sodium=1234 ? Or what are other
> > ways to achieve inteorpeable data ?
> A severely limited answer would be SNOMED-CT/LOINC and
> friends. The conceptually better answer is http://www.openehr.org
> as was mentioned before here...
>
> Karsten
> --
I looked at the openehr site, and it is in construction. It doesn't have
any non-generalizing , non-push-my cart documents. I looked at snomed-ct
but there's something about a license with this one, but it looks
promising: ? has anyone obtained the snomed-ct software to look at it?
I tried my icd-9 based search thing put on the past history panel ( in
testarea/sjtan/handler_devel/client - hey , everyone else is pushing
their carts, why not join in?) , which Ian pointed out is a little slow
(average 1-3 seconds , up to 10 seconds if too many words are included)
( but it sort of works !! ) : it finds conditions ok, and was able to
find most symptoms, things like :
headache
temporal arteritis
but not , temporal headache
shortness of breath
asthma
but not , wheeze , wheezy or rhonchi
I know some of the exceptional data in the icd9 text was excluded , as
they were in tables and needed to be parsed e.g. the hypertension table,
and the diabetes table ( um, only minor clinical conditions missing,
uh?)
It might be possible to convert the icd-9 into a coding-labelled object
tree of Observation objects, but I'm not sure if it's worth the effort.
Has anyone got a publically available ( with data installed) terminology
database (object or otherwise)? The gehr hasn't got data in it, but
Snowmed is supposed to have 3 * 10^5 terms, with over 1 * 10^6 words
etc.. I gather it's free for NHS related work , but royalties apply for
commercial developers.
How about writing a tool to parse the icd9 file into relations , anyone
want me to have a go ? (don't care?) .
Q. what is the optimal structure of the table(s), as the icd9 text is
like a wide, short tree.
because of Snomed-CT and the like, this effort is really prototypical ,
because it's just re-invention on a crude, backyard level.
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Gnumed-devel Digest, Vol 5, Issue 7,
sjtan <=