Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed/client/etc/config-definitions/DBDefault.definitions vs. gnumed/sql/gmConfigData.sql

[Hilmar Berger]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:58:45 +0100
Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden> wrote:

> > It is unnecessary in the context of using the config-definitions file as 
> > well
> > (Hilmar's code does actually read both, I still don't understand how
> > this works, let alone why)
> > But as I said, if you want to use the SQL table, fine, but then we
> > should get rid of config-definitions,
> I agree w/ replacing the config-definition files with metadata
> tables alright. I would not necessarily get rid of the
> concept, though.
I'm fine with moving the metadata from config-definitions to backend tables. 
Will have a look on that this week.

Hilmar