gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed client > 0.2.8.1 menu alteration proposals


From: James Busser
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed client > 0.2.8.1 menu alteration proposals
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 08:48:37 -0800


On 4-Jan-08, at 4:00 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

By design all options that get set explicitely are
constrained to "this" user and workplace. It is just that an
administrator can set user/workplace independant values
which will get looked up and then used as the default value
should no user/workplace specific default exist.

A related question, apart from how we group menu options, is how to manage the availability of features depending on the user. For example, doctors would be allowed to do and access things that receptionists may not. And maybe it is desirable that not every doctor be able to do all things administrative. What are the best (or even manageable) choices among

- configuring the presence or absence of menu options, by user

- keeping the menu options constant across users, but just enabling or disabling (dimming) menu items according to user

- keeping the same menu items available to all users, communicating anything that is disallowed to the user e.g. with a beep and a notice in the status line like
        "Feature restricted ...  insufficient privileges"

... likewise the question would arise for plug-ins, whether to control whether certain users can add them to their plug-in lists and how these can or cannot be used once the user is back in the client

Naturally some menu items or plug-ins will permit some users partial views or partial write-access, those would be controlled programmatically inside the menu item or plug-in




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]