[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit befor
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save) |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:57:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:38:56AM -0700, James Busser wrote:
>>> trainee doctors... managing a patient under my care...
>>> ... *insisted*... Staph aureus growing in the patient's blood.
>
>> A simple confirmative phone call to the lab
>> would resolve the situation.
>
> Well, now I have had my laugh for the day ;-)
Not sure why, but I hope that's good.
>> I am not sure I quite appreciate how this relates to editing
>> narrative.
>
> It was an indirect analogy being that a lab result was written into the
> record, was seen and acted on by a provider.
I see.
> The result was then changed
> in a way that gave no indication that a change had occurred and to make
> matters worse there was no way *within the record in question* to
> identify (audit) that the change had been made. It is not a question of a
> widget not having been written... the "original" was now "gone". As
> Rogerio indicated, this should NOT BE (allowed to be) POSSIBLE.
I fully agree that making a previous record GONE without
trace should not easily be possible (it is very hard to be
made entirely impossible).
> The same
> is true with narrative. I am having trouble understanding that there
> would be a difference.
There isn't. I wasn't sure whether you intended the example
to simply be an analogy-in-point rather than a concrete
example of how non-visibility of *narrative* changes would
be harmful.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] client tcp/ip and Postgres timeouts, (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save, Jerzy Luszawski, 2008/08/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save, James Busser, 2008/08/12
- access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), James Busser, 2008/08/12
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Jerzy Luszawski, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), James Busser, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save),
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Jerzy Luszawski, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Rogerio Luz, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), James Busser, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/15
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), James Busser, 2008/08/16
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/16
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), James Busser, 2008/08/16