[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit befor
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save) |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:09:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 03:06:01PM -0700, James Busser wrote:
> Is it manageable to be added to the next database version, and what
> options should be considered for making a revision > 0 visible?
I'll try to get narrative with revision notice into 0.3. The
journal will be fairly easy while the tree requires a bit
more of meddling with database views.
> I had been worried that colorization could be too distracting in the EMR
> tree,
I agree.
> however if the problem list were collapsed at the episode level,
> and if only some subset of the "open" episodes was exposed, and if within
> an episode not all encounters would be constantly in view (they may be
> scrolled out of view) then the "offending" (distracting) encounters may
> not even be in view all the time. Thus any distraction by color, when it
> would be for trivial changes, may only come into view when relevant. Is
> this analysis correct?
It is correct but I'd still tend to shy away from colorisation.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), (continued)
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Rogerio Luz, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), James Busser, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/15
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), James Busser, 2008/08/16
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/16
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), James Busser, 2008/08/16
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/16
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/17
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), James Busser, 2008/08/13
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save),
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), James Busser, 2008/08/16
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/17
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Rogerio Luz, 2008/08/17
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/17
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Rogerio Luz, 2008/08/17
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/17
- Re: access to review audits (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save), Rogerio Luz, 2008/08/17
- [Gnumed-devel] Redundant (duplicate) results -- was Re: access to review audits, James Busser, 2008/08/18
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Redundant (duplicate) results -- was Re: access to review audits, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] encounter edit before final save, Karsten Hilbert, 2008/08/12