[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010
From: |
Jim Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010 |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:17:59 -0700 |
On 2010-08-12, at 2:23 PM, lkcl wrote:
> late so quick reply.
>
> * i'd like to do a demo even if i have to write in 30 mins a pyjamas-based
> "quick grid" where i am forced to type in the clin.lab_request pk in an
> input box.
Please acknowledge that the German workflow which spawned "lab request" as a
potential test *driver* is NOT REFLECTIVE of the Canadian (BC.CA) workflow by
which labs return.
In Canada, the lab request will exist *only* on the *paper* order that was
generated by the ordering provider WHO MAY OFTEN NOT BE A MEMBER OF THE PRAXIS
or who may have completed the test order paperwork at the hospital.
So --- except when GNUmed will later generate a pk *together* with a paper
order that a path lab will accept and even then this only covers a subset of
the incoming lab test results --- there will exist *no* record in
clin.lab_request for the incoming labs to match "against".
If and when GNUmed would generate a pk which could be included in the round
trip to the lab and then returning with the results, this will cover only those
lab requests generated from inside the praxis and from inside GNUmed. In all
other cases,
ORC 004 Placer Group Number (External Order ID eg: Requisition number)
will either be null, or it will be a foreign pk originating from some foreign
praxis and irrelevant to GNUmed.
So I had thought that maybe you were auto-creating a match inside
clin.lab_request when none seemed to already exist, but figured I should make
this question and answer explicit :-)
-- Jim
- [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Sebastian Hilbert, 2010/08/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, lkcl, 2010/08/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Jim Busser, 2010/08/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, lkcl, 2010/08/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010,
Jim Busser <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Jim Busser, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Jim Busser, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Jim Busser, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Jim Busser, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Jim Busser, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Open Source Health Informatics, London, 30th Sep 2010, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/14