[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !

From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 00:18:45 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:39:05PM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:

> However, whether or not code 250 was ever originally
> assigned, if it turns out that the episode was actually
> about Diabetes insipidus and the episode name or health
> issue was incompletely inputted, why on earth would you want
> to keep 250

That's what I was thinking.

But, again, this can be made configurable.

> This is why I believe that when a user alters the description name, they 
> cannot make a proper decision whether to keep or alter one or more codes 
> unless they can see, in real-time, (without having to hover, side-by-side)
>       Description [CodeSystem CodeValue OfficialReferenceTerm]

Sure, at the time of attaching codes to
issues/episodes/whatever you'll be able to see the full
information of the code.

Practically speaking, the episode/issue details edit area
will show the list of currently attached codes with meaning
and system, of course.

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]