[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance R
From: |
Andreas Tille |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release) |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:17:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:45:06PM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> > Well, that's wrong. I stumbled upon the documentation *because* it has
> > changed! It was OK in gnumed-doc_1.1.7-1_all.deb. There were *no*
> > images
>
> which simply is(was) was a mistake back then.
What a fortunate mistake which created pretty useful stuff which does
not exist without this mistake. I wished every mistake would be of
this nature!
> > at all and *all* links worked.
>
> which is due to the upgrade of the PublishScript in FosWiki.
So why not downgrading again?
> > I stumbled upon the change
> > because my build system did not worked any more because file locations
> > had changed.
>
> We can certainly implement something that will restore the file locations.
> What
> is the exact problem ? All future wiki export will have said directory layout.
The exact problems are:
- Broken Links
- Ugly and finally for the content totally irrelevant header image
- A lot of pretty useless JavaScript stuff
> > So if you simply and straight would do the very same as in
> > version 1.1.7 all problems are vanished.
>
> Yeah I know but I don't have enough magic to turn back time.
There is no need to turn back time. It would be enough to turn back
code. I do not know this Wiki software but it seems to have done a
bad move.
> > But *you* did changed
> > something in the first place and the change was definitely no feature
> > and I'm not willing to support this broken doc in Debian.
> >
> I believe all but the javascript problems should now be fixed.
>
> > Just make it as it was. This is what Joey Purehardwareuser want's on
> > his computer and please also spare him this stupid fancy JavaScripting
> > stuff at bottom right. You are draining the offline user into trouble.
>
> Maybe. I see your point. However since it will simply fail to load the js
> from
> the online server while user is offline nothing bad will stem from that. If
> however the user is online and reads the offline docs he will have the chance
> to
> chance with us :-) I consider this a feature :-)
>
> I will try to see if there is a way to remove that online chat feature from
> offline documentation.
>
> > Just use the old method you used last year and everything will be fine.
>
> If it was that easy. I had to do an security update of TWiki (long overdue)
> and that changed what comes almost beyond my control.
>
> So apart from the wiki chat all problems (links, images etc) should now be
> fixed. The images are now part of the documentation, officially. There is
> just a
> handful of cases where the same image is stored under different name but
> since
> this stems from Wiki's internal working I do not consider this a bug ( the
> images really do appear more then once in the html files)
Would you mind building an RC tarball like
gnumed-client.1.1.10~rc.tgz
to let me have a look?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
- [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), (continued)
- [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Andreas Tille, 2012/01/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Karsten Hilbert, 2012/01/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Sebastian Hilbert, 2012/01/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Karsten Hilbert, 2012/01/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Sebastian Hilbert, 2012/01/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Karsten Hilbert, 2012/01/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Andreas Tille, 2012/01/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Sebastian Hilbert, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Andreas Tille, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Sebastian Hilbert, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release),
Andreas Tille <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Karsten Hilbert, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Andreas Tille, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Sebastian Hilbert, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Andreas Tille, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Sebastian Hilbert, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Andreas Tille, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Karsten Hilbert, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Sebastian Hilbert, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Karsten Hilbert, 2012/01/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GnuMed documentation (Was: GNUmed 1.1.9 Maintenance Release), Sebastian Hilbert, 2012/01/13