[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism
From: |
Martin Uecker |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Aug 2002 23:38:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:09:09AM -0500, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> On Monday 19 August 2002 07:05 am, you wrote:
[...]
> How do you prevent the RIAA to massively insert negative ratings (or positive
> ratings for that matter) and tell other people about it? Google's page-rank
> and /.'s moderation system can be foiled if you've got enough resources at
> your expense.
Trust metrics can be made attack resistant (see advogato.org).
> I would not like to have a system where a powerful adversary
> can make nodes believe that a certain document is spam (worthless) and make
> the nodes remove it. That would not be very censorship resistant. And while I
> agree that you may be able to drown a keyword by inserting lots of useless
> results under the same name, it's harder to do this for 'all' keywords.
Keyword lookup is basically useless if I have to know that DeCSS
can only be found with the keyword "DeCSS-do-not-censor-me-XYZ".
bye,
Martin
- [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism, Martin Uecker, 2002/08/17
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism, Igor Wronsky, 2002/08/17
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism, Martin Uecker, 2002/08/17
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism, Igor Wronsky, 2002/08/17
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism, Martin Uecker, 2002/08/18
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism, Christian Grothoff, 2002/08/18
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism, Martin Uecker, 2002/08/19
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism, Christian Grothoff, 2002/08/19
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism,
Martin Uecker <=
Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism, Thomas Formella, 2002/08/17
Re: [GNUnet-developers] update mechanism, Christian Grothoff, 2002/08/17