gnunet-developers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNUnet-developers] womb / maintainers description rewrite


From: Nils Gillmann
Subject: Re: [GNUnet-developers] womb / maintainers description rewrite
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:00:03 +0000

Christian Grothoff transcribed 4.1K bytes:
> On 06/28/2018 04:13 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> > link in line 1 returns:
> > 
> > package: gnunet
> > doc-category: Internet
> > doc-summary: Secure, decentralized, peer-to-peer networking framework
> > doc-url: http://gnunet.org/book
> > gplv3-status: depends-on-mysql (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48)
> 
> Should be corrected to AGPLv3+. (or 'yes').
> 
> > activity-status: ok 201404008 (0.10.1, java-0.10.1, gtk-0.10.1, 
> > fuse-0.10.0/20131222)
> > 
> > package: libextractor
> > logo: /software/libextractor/extractor_logo.png
> > doc-category: Audio
> > doc-summary: Library to extract meta-data from media files
> > doc-url: htmlxref
> > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet (gnumaint-reply 20 Aug 2007 20:40:48)
> 
> Should be corrected to GPLv3+. (or 'yes').
> 
> > activity-status: stale 20131223 (1.3)
> > 
> > package: libmicrohttpd
> > copyright-holder: notfsf
> > language: c
> > doc-category: Libraries
> > doc-summary: C library implementing an HTTP 1.1 server
> > doc-url: /software/libmicrohttpd/manual/
> > gplv3-status: depends-on-gnunet-lgplv2.1+
> 
> Should be LGPLv3+.
> 
> > For 1 I propose to correct the doc-url entry, we already have a first
> > initial state of https://docs.gnunet.org publicly accessible.
> 
> Sure.
> 
> > license status does only reflect the latest release (maybe its intended
> > to be that way?).
> 
> No, it's just way outdated.
> 
> > libextractor is not stale in development.
> 
> And had more recent releases.
> 
> > lmhd had more recent releases I think.
> 
> Yes, 0.9.59 by now.
> 
> > For 2: Let us rewrite the text. I've seen that you were active at the new
> > website with a small fitting description, and we should sync that. The
> > current package description was adjusted by myself at some point in the
> > last couple of years.
> 
> Well, that sounds like you know _how_ to do this, so please do! :-)
> 

Thanks for you reply.

I know who to call (not the Ghostbusters).
That's all. I'll see what I can achieve.

I think we wait for adjusting the description
text of gnunet until the new website is online
and the description text production ready? At
least that's what I would do.

> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]