Re: [GNUnet-developers] estimated 0.11 release or next rc?

[Schanzenbach, Martin]

Hi dvn,

I had a discussion wrt gitlab offlist with grothoff as well.
tl;dr I am also a proponent of gitlab instead of BB+mantis. Even considering 
its problems.
I also think that docker is a good and solid solution to keep services running 
and up to date.
To be honest, to me guixsd seems to me like its ready for prime time almost as 
much as gnunet...

@grothoff: let's give it a try? It is a reasonable short-term solution.

BR

> On 27. Jan 2019, at 22:48, Devan Carpenter [dvn] <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Hi Christian,
> 
> Christian Grothoff transcribed 0.5K bytes:
>> Hi Dvn,
>> 
>> Could you please provide an update, and/or file a bug report on the
>> specific open issues you see?
> 
> Yea, I'll open a ticket.
> 
> Short version: I believe we should be using Gitlab CI - I'll put my
> arguments for it in the ticket.
> 
> I've already set up a bare instance of Gitlab on sam.gnunet.org.
> It is running in a 'container', and is accessible on the web at
> https://gitea.gnunet.org - a leftover from testing Gitea.
> We should set a new subdomain, and corresponding virtual server for
> `gitlab.gnunet.org`, of course, if we plan to move forward.
> 
> This is the first time anyone is hearing about this, because I have not
> felt like we have come to a reasonable conclusion to the server
> situation. There is a desire to move everything to firefly.gnunet.org,
> but I feel that the limitations with that host have made it impractical
> to use for real longterm services. (For those whom are not aware, it is
> running GuixSD.) However, the praticalities of this may have changed for
> me, as Guix has recently welcomed the additon of a Docker service to
> their system.
> 
> Let's discuss!
> 
> Devan / dvn
> 
> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Christian
>> 
>> On 1/27/19 10:26 AM, Catonano wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Il giorno sab 26 gen 2019 alle ore 11:00 Schanzenbach, Martin
>>> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> ha scritto:
>>> 
>>>    I would advocate that we do not release before we have proper test
>>>    automation/CI in place again.
>>>    Too much code has changed.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> is there an advancement status about the CI ?
>>> 
>>> Are there any tickets related to that ?

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP