Re: db / gdl2

[Adam Fedor]

David Ayers wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I've just checked the archives.  It has been a while since the first 
> time (Janurary or even earlier?) gdl2 was "pre" announced.  Now if I 
> understand it correctly, there are still some unresolved leagal issues. 
> In the meantime, I was wondering whether we could reactivate (or rather 
> intensify) support for the db-libs.

I think there will always be unresolved legal issues (until we can 
afford to hire a lawyer). I've talked to some people but no one will/can 
resolve any of these problems.

Really I don't think these problems are any greater than the ones 
GNUstep has as a whole, so I think it should be a moot issue.


> 1. Is there a reason why these libraries are installed in 
> GNUSTEP_LOCAL_ROOT instead of GNUSTEP_SYSTEM_ROOT by default?

Nope. Should be SYSTEM_ROOT.


--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp.      | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
http://www.doc.com                    | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
                                      | know how I hate the stuff.