Re: Public methods description should be in header files

[Adam Fedor]

Nicola Pero wrote:
> It looks like we are totally disagreeing, and I'm already enough tired by
> our previous discussion on logging, so I don't want to get into a long
> argument, and I will refrain from any further comments.
>
> But please record my disagreement (which is nothing new to you I suppose).
>
> I don't think I'll write any (more) reference documentation if it is
> managed in this way.

I'd rather come up with a solution we all agree on. I LIKE you idea 
also. It's nice to have all the useful information consolidated in one 
place. I'm just not sure I know how we can compromise at this point.


--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp.      | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
http://www.doc.com                    | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
                                      | know how I hate the stuff.