Re: removing the 'make install'-->'make all' dependency

[David Ayers]

Alexander Malmberg wrote:

> I originally sent this 2002-12-11, but I haven't gotten it yet and I
> don't see it in the archives, so I'm assuming it got lost somewhere.
> Apologies if it's a duplicate.
Same here.. :-) I'm not sure what happend to my reply either, so here 
are my 2 cents...

I also the believe that 'install' should comply with the coding standard 
and be dependant of 'all'.  As Helge also suggested, I would vote for 
having a new target (maybe 'inst') that would do the actuall 
installation and have 'install' depend on 'all' and 'inst'. That way 
there would be compliance to the standard, yet "advanced" users could 
still use the faster feature.

Cheer,.
Dave