Re: [NSDecimalNumber numberWithDouble:x]

[Adam Fedor]

On Monday, January 12, 2004, at 10:53 AM, David Ayers wrote:

> > > Hmm.. we may not really need to test against the concrete classes in 
> > > the numberWith*: methods as long as we never use them internally and 
> > > as long as we don't care about code that gets the classes via 
> > > NSClassFromString and class those methods.  I'd say it's an edge 
> > > case.  (But I haven't tested what could go wrong.)
> > I think you only need to test the concrete class.
>
> I'm pretty sure the implementations in NSNumber must test for the 
> *abstract* NSNumber class (and should/could arguably also test the 
> concrete class corresponding to the type supplied).

Oops. Sorry, that's what I meant to say (abstract, NOT concrete).