[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases
From: |
Steven Bosscher |
Subject: |
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:29:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 23:54, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > I would indeed hold up the release because of C++ breakage. C++ is a
> > release-critical language; Objective-C is not. That's very much
> > analagous to the fact that IA32 GNU/Linux is a release-critical
> > platform; other systems like SH ELF are not.
>
> How is Objective-C not a release-critical language?
>
> 1) Quite a few people use it
> 2) GCC is the only useful ObjC compiler out there
> 3) Apple would rather not deal with GCC dev fucktardism
> 4) Gnustep would rather not deal with GCC dev fucktardism
Considering the above, it seems you should develop your own compiler
instead of filling my mail box and everyone elses with this kind of
crap.
Gr.
Steven
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Patrick McFarland, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Mark Mitchell, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Patrick McFarland, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Nicolas Roard, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases,
Steven Bosscher <=
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Robert Dewar, 2005/01/25
- Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/01/25
Re: Objective-C bugs and GCC releases, Joe Buck, 2005/01/25
Message not available