[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Debug as default...

From: Gregory John Casamento
Subject: Re: Debug as default...
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:41:58 -0700 (PDT)


Could you be more specific about what architectures, how much memory, what 
operating system you are seeing the sluggishness on?   If there are performance 
bottlenecks in GNUstep, this information would be extremely helpful in rooting 
out any problems which might exist.

On both of my intel machines, a 700 MHz Pentium III and a 3.2GHz Dual P4, 
GNUstep is quite fast.   Additionally, it works very well on my SPARC5 under 
Solaris.   Which machines are you seeing a problem on? 


--Gregory Casamento

----- Original Message ----
From: Riccardo <address@hidden>
To: Gregory John Casamento <address@hidden>
Cc: GNUstep Developers <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 5:43:21 PM
Subject: Re: Debug as default...


On Sunday, September 10, 2006, at 07:40 AM, Gregory John Casamento wrote:

> I'm mentioning this again in order to start a discussion on the 
> pros/cons of doing this.

since I find that lately gnustep is sluggish enough by itself and swaps 
wildly while loading... I'd vote against that.
A reasonable setup would be to have it on for the svn version, but 
disabled in the release tarballs?
Or should be more seriously speak about stable and unstable releases?
O just enable -g with "make debug=yes" it makes more sense to me than 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]