[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnustep release numbers

From: Gregory John Casamento
Subject: Re: gnustep release numbers
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:33:50 -0700 (PDT)

Since, you're the one making this assertion, I believe it's up to you to prove 
that we have broken it in every release.

I don't have the same impression.

Gregory Casamento

----- Original Message ----
From: Helge Hess <address@hidden>
To: Developer GNUstep <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2006 12:26:39 PM
Subject: Re: gnustep release numbers

On Oct 4, 2006, at 13:46, David Ayers wrote:
> IIRC we have a long
> discussion in the archive about not bumping SO numbers unless we know
> binary compatibility was broken.

Did we have a single gstep-base release which did NOT break the ABI?  
I don't think so.
As mentioned in that long discussion ;-) I'm in favor of doing an  
occasional ABI stable release and have frequent ABI unstable ones  
properly tagged as such. The latter then do not need to preserve ABI  
stability for sonames.

Helge Hess

Gnustep-dev mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]