Re: Moving GNUstep applications to GPLv3

[Fred Kiefer]

I support this change as well. We already have the choice for the user
of the library in there:

   This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
   modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public
   License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
   version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

What I am not sure about is, whether we are able to change the license
for old code, where the contributor is no longer in contact with us.
Does anybody know about this case?

Cheers,
Fred

Gregory John Casamento wrote:
> Great!   What you explained is the intention.
> 
> Later, GJC
> --
> Gregory Casamento
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Nicola Pero <address@hidden>
> To: Gregory John Casamento <address@hidden>
> Cc: GNUstep Developers <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 8:23:27 PM
> Subject: RE: Moving GNUstep applications to GPLv3
> 
> 
>> If we decide to move to the new license, then my opinion on the best way for 
>> the 
>> project to proceed is to change the license of our applications (GWorkspace, 
>> Gorm, 
>> etc) within GNUstep itself to the GPLv3 license.   All of the libraries 
>> should 
>> remain LGPL.
> 
> You probably mean that the software which is currently under GPLv2 will be
> moved to GPLv3, and software that is currently under LGPLv2 will be 
> moved to LGPLv3.
> 
> I would personally support and welcome this change.
> 
> Thanks