[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about GNUstep DL2
From: |
Matt Rice |
Subject: |
Re: Question about GNUstep DL2 |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jan 2010 09:41:09 -0800 |
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Yavor Doganov <address@hidden> wrote:
> gnustep-dl2 [1]
> DBModeler
> GDL2 palette
> eoutil, gdlgsdoc
> EOModeler (as private library)
> Recommends: libeointerface-dev (which will pull in libeoaccess-dev)
Sorry It just hit me that both DBModeler and GDL2 palette use the
EOModeler library which might pose a problem for making EOModeler
'private' (not sure how you go about achieving this private library
really.)
the GDL2 Palette dependency on EOModeler would be trivial to remove,
the only thing GDL2Palette should use in EOModeler is the
EOMPropertyPboardType, which is just a variable containing a string,
which could be hard coded in a debian local patch or something, sorry
I didn't think about this yesterday.
- Question about GNUstep DL2, Federico Giménez Nieto, 2010/01/03
- Re: Question about GNUstep DL2, Matt Rice, 2010/01/03
- Re: Question about GNUstep DL2, Yavor Doganov, 2010/01/04
- Re: Question about GNUstep DL2, Yavor Doganov, 2010/01/04
- Re: Question about GNUstep DL2, Matt Rice, 2010/01/07
- Re: Question about GNUstep DL2, Yavor Doganov, 2010/01/07
- Re: Question about GNUstep DL2, Matt Rice, 2010/01/07
- Re: Question about GNUstep DL2, David Ayers, 2010/01/07
- Re: Question about GNUstep DL2, Yavor Doganov, 2010/01/08
- Re: Question about GNUstep DL2,
Matt Rice <=
- Re: Question about GNUstep DL2, Yavor Doganov, 2010/01/08
Re: Question about GNUstep DL2, Federico Gimenez Nieto, 2010/01/04