[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep CoreData
From: |
Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep CoreData |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:40:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; NetBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.2 |
Hi,
On 09/08/13 12:30, Gregory Casamento wrote:
All of that being said the copyright requirement does have the legal
effect of removing any doubt regarding who owns and is in control of
the code. That is the one advantage it carries, but as for forking
rest assured it has been considered by some.
Well, when you think of opensource the second word you hear is "fork"...
probably before learning "commit".
Forking has been considered for many reasons.. copyright issues...
organization of the SVN repository... disagreement with leadership of
the maintainers, refusal of patches, fixes, etc etc.
Every status has disadvantages. I do like the idea of a backed
copyright, especially in the case something like cocotron would become a
serious contender. Or A derivative project from our code (think about
potential mac ports) would try to get closed and commercial.
On the other had, disadvantages are at hand.
Riccardo
PS: I bet that if we were stronger and more important, we could make
some pressure on rms to make Obj-C a bit more important in GCC...
- GNUstep CoreData, Muhammad Hussein Nasrollahpour, 2013/09/05
- Re: GNUstep CoreData, Adam Fedor, 2013/09/05
- Re: GNUstep CoreData, Muhammad Hussein Nasrollahpour, 2013/09/05
- Re: GNUstep CoreData, Gregory Casamento, 2013/09/05
- Re: GNUstep CoreData, Fred Kiefer, 2013/09/05
- Re: GNUstep CoreData, Gregory Casamento, 2013/09/06
- Re: GNUstep CoreData, Luboš Doležel, 2013/09/06
- Re: GNUstep CoreData, Gregory Casamento, 2013/09/07
- Re: GNUstep CoreData, Derek Fawcus, 2013/09/07
- Re: GNUstep CoreData, Gregory Casamento, 2013/09/08
- Re: GNUstep CoreData,
Riccardo Mottola <=