[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnutls 0.2.0
From: |
Robert van der Meulen |
Subject: |
Re: gnutls 0.2.0 |
Date: |
Wed Aug 8 16:52:01 2001 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
Quoting Philip Hazel (address@hidden):
> On 7 Aug 2001, Werner Koch wrote:
> > I already talked with Nikos about using Exim as a real world program
> > to test GNU TLS. Philip, Robert, what do you think about this?
> > Should we give it a try?
> Fine by me. I'm afraid I know nothing about GNU TLS. Will it require
> source hacking in Exim? The current code is all contained in a single
> source module which makes OpenSSL calls. Presumably this could easily be
> modified if the API is different.
Same here :)
How hard will it be to transition ? How much stability can i expect from
gnutls ?
As the freeze is coming closer, i'm a bit hesitant to adding an exim-tls to
debian until it's really stable.
There is a 'gnutls' ITP for Debian, and i personally know the maintainer.
I'll talk to him and see if we can get things in sync.
Greets,
Robert
--
Linux Generation
encrypted mail preferred. finger address@hidden for my GnuPG/PGP key.
Marijuana is nature's way of saying, "Hi!".
- gnutls 0.2.0, Nikos Mavroyanopoulos, 2001/08/07
- Re: gnutls 0.2.0, Werner Koch, 2001/08/07
- Re: gnutls 0.2.0, Philip Hazel, 2001/08/08
- Re: gnutls 0.2.0,
Robert van der Meulen <=
- Re: gnutls 0.2.0, Re: gnutls 0.2.0, Werner Koch, 2001/08/08
- Re: gnutls 0.2.0, Re: gnutls 0.2.0, Philip Hazel, 2001/08/09
- Re: gnutls 0.2.0, Re: gnutls 0.2.0, Werner Koch, 2001/08/09
Re: gnutls 0.2.0, Simon Josefsson, 2001/08/07