Re: why gnutls when we have openssl?

[Werner Koch]

On 23 Aug 2001 09:30:11 -0400, Dan Winship said:

> People use this example a lot, but it's not true. Microsoft made
> proprietary extensions to the Kerberos *specification* (RFC 1510), not
> to any existing Kerberos implementation. When the first interoperability

[You have seen the source?]

> testing between MIT and Microsoft kerberos was done, the two
> implementations had different bugs, so it's unlikely they used any
> significant amount of the MIT code at all.

They could have done this and in fact the first TCP/IP implementions
where heavily based on BSD code.


-- 
Werner Koch        Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
g10 Code GmbH      et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est.
Privacy Solutions                                        -- Augustinus