[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnutls-dev] Re: Intent to implement DTLS
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: [gnutls-dev] Re: Intent to implement DTLS |
Date: |
Mon, 9 May 2005 13:31:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
On Monday 09 May 2005 12:06, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> 2) "Fix" the current code by (re)introducing a clean separation between
> the handshake, record and transport layer, and remove the bias towards
> TCP. This means adding DTLS on top of it will be painless and there
> won't be lots of code duplication. However it will touch a lot of
> existing code.
Hello,
I think this is the best approach to use. But what kind of separation between
the layers do you need? In what sense they are not separated?
--
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos