[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:50:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> If guile-1.8-dev is required, would it be possible for configure to test
>> for this? Ludovic?
>
> Yes, 1.8 is required. I'd expect the `guile-snarf' detection to fail
> with 1.6, though.
It seems to be part of 1.6 too:
address@hidden:~$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/guile-snarf
guile-1.6-dev: /usr/bin/guile-snarf
address@hidden:~$ guile-snarf
/* cpp arguments: */
i486-linux-gnu-gcc: no input files
address@hidden:~$
> I'll add a more reliable test anyway.
Thanks. Perhaps a test for the feature that seems to break things here?
SCM_API, scm_t_bits, or whatever it might have been.
/Simon
- [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?, Simon Josefsson, 2007/06/14
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/06/14
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/06/17
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/06/25
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?, Simon Josefsson, 2007/06/26
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?, Simon Josefsson, 2007/06/26
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/06/26
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?, Simon Josefsson, 2007/06/27
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/06/27
- Re: [gnutls-dev] Guile needs 1.8?, Simon Josefsson, 2007/06/29