[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: benchmarking mod_gnutls vs mod_ssl
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: benchmarking mod_gnutls vs mod_ssl |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:16:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Werner Koch <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 12:41, address@hidden said:
>
>> So it seems libgcrypt is quite optimized in amd64... However there
>
> Right, we have new optimized code for amd64 but the plain ia32 code is
> pretty old and it might even be that the generic C implementation is
> faster.
Is that optimized MPI code? Or AES? I'll see if I can test with
--disable-asm in a live test. We should also test non-RSA and non-AES
to see if we can pin-point what is slow.
>> with the small file). Possibly the RSA blinding...
>
> I have a 10% performance penality for the blinding in mind. Lets see:
Doesn't openssl also do rsa blinding?
/Simon