[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: releasing LGPL version of opencdk?
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: releasing LGPL version of opencdk? |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Apr 2008 11:58:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Timo Schulz <address@hidden> writes:
> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
>> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding naming, on second thought, I think it would be better to avoid
>>> having 'gnutls' in the name of the LGPL package since it would be
>>> confusing if any non-gnutls projects to link with it.
>>> 'libopencdk-lite'?
>>
>> I also like the lite version better :)
>
> I've to agree, that the 'gnutls' part might confuse user.
> So it's settled, we use the 'libopencdk-lite' name :-).
It seems the savannah people do not like project names that contain
'open'...
https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?7859
How do you feel about using 'freecdk'? This let us avoid the -lite
suffix which is nice. Or 'minicdk'?
/Simon
- Re: releasing LGPL version of opencdk?,
Simon Josefsson <=