[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Symbol conflict between libgnutls-openssl and real openssl
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: Symbol conflict between libgnutls-openssl and real openssl |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:59:56 +0300 |
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
<address@hidden> wrote:
>>> What do you think about this proposal?
>>
>> I like it. gnutls/openssl.h should thus contain a set of #define's such
>> as:
>>
>> #define MD5_Init gnutls_openssl_MD5_Init
>>
>> Fortunately we have never guaranteed binary level compatibility with
>> OpenSSL, so this change does not require any API changes in applications
>> that uses libgnutls-openssl, just a recompile. It will indeed require a
>> SONAME bump, and currently both libgnutls and libgnutls-openssl share
>> the same SONAME version. We have discussed before if and how these
>> versions can be separated. I suspect we have to make a decision now.
>
> I think this is too much fuss. The gnutls-openssl layer is quick and
> dirty fix. I wouldn't recommend to any applications to use it. Either
> use openssl or gnutls directly. If you have this issue why not
> recompile the application with openssl instead?
I'm not so much against any such patch. I'm mostly against maintaining
this gnutls-openssl library. I think we should drop it.
regards,
Nikos