[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, an
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:02:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125) |
Joe Orton wrote:
> I've tried this using a git build of GnuTLS, gnutls-cli and a test
> httpd/mod_ssl server configured for per-location client cert auth (i.e.
> it requests a second handshake after the GET request is recevied), and
> it does fail, so I think this is indeed a GnuTLS bug in the handling of
> rehandshakes.
Hello Joe,
I the test case was not correct. The call (from server) to
gnutls_rehandshake will only notify the client about a rehandshake.
After that a call to gnutls_handshake is required. Once I do this the
test case works correctly (i've also committed it).
To debug (1 - gnutls-cli log output from testing using httpd/mod_ssl)
you might need some output from mod_ssl as well. There the server
notifies the client about a rehandshake, the client starts the handshake
by sending client hello and the server replies with an alert.
regards,
Nikos
- Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, (continued)
- Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2008/11/21
- Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/21
- Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2008/11/21
- Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/21
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/22
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/22
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/22
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/22
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2008/11/23
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/28
- Re: Bug#480041: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce,
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <=
Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/21
Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/21
Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce, Joe Orton, 2008/11/21
gnutls-cli return codes [was: Re: confirmation that debian #480041 is a gnutls problem, and steps to reproduce], Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2008/11/21