[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gdoc replacement
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: gdoc replacement |
Date: |
Tue, 12 May 2009 22:05:30 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Hi Martin. I had finally time to look into this, and I believe I have
> solved it in git master. You can depend on the order things are
> substituted: they seems to be done in ASCII order. Your initial patch
> seems to be the correct thing. However, it changed the order of how the
> substitutions were applied. So rather than working around that problem
> using your patch (which caused other problems) I modified your initial
> regexp so that it does the same thing but is applied later.
>
> I really prefer to stop messing with the gdoc script. It should be
> rewritten cleanly and added to gnulib. Before doing that, it begs the
> question why we don't abandon the GTK-DOC style and use the doxygen
> format instead, which probably has conversion tools already. I'm not
> sure what the answer is. I think the GTK-DOC HTML manual and
> integration into the GNOME environment is a good thing. But maybe that
> can be achieved via doxygen anyway, through a conversion script?
> Changing to doxygen instead of gtk-doc will require source-code changes,
> too.
> What do people generally think of GTK-DOC vs Doxygen?
I used doxygen some time after I messed up with gdoc and I liked the
output. The only reason I didn't port gnutls to it was lack of time :)
best regards,
Nikos