[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?
|
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
|
Subject: |
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:47:07 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 02/19/2011 10:38 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:14, address@hidden said:
>
>> That's a nice question. This API is mostly interesting to people
>> who are porting gnutls to another crypto library. We might
>
> An API is an API, is an API.
Indeed but it doesn't have to be stable. That part was intended to
change often by design.
regards,
Nikos
- ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Andreas Metzler, 2011/02/17
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/17
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Andreas Metzler, 2011/02/18
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Werner Koch, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?,
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <=
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Werner Koch, 2011/02/20
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/02/21
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/21
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Werner Koch, 2011/02/18