gnutls-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnutls 3.0.10


From: Andreas Radke
Subject: Re: gnutls 3.0.10
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:48:07 +0100

make check hangs for all time (half an hour and more)
until I break it at this point here now:

PASS: testcerts
==================
All 2 tests passed
==================
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/tests/openpgp-certs'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/tests/openpgp-certs'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/tests'
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check-am'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13'
  GEN    public-submodule-commit
^C
==> ERROR: Aborted by user! Exiting...
==1136== 16,464 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 21 of 22
==1136==    at 0x4C28024: calloc (in 
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==1136==    by 0x4E5549A: _mbuffer_alloc (in 
/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/lib/.libs/libgnutls.so.28.6.0)
==1136==    by 0x4E56381: _gnutls_io_read_buffered (in 
/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/lib/.libs/libgnutls.so.28.6.0)
==1136==    by 0x4E51A13: _gnutls_recv_in_buffers (in 
/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/lib/.libs/libgnutls.so.28.6.0)
==1136==    by 0x4E57943: _gnutls_handshake_io_recv_int (in 
/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/lib/.libs/libgnutls.so.28.6.0)
==1136==    by 0x4E5A8D7: _gnutls_recv_handshake (in 
/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/lib/.libs/libgnutls.so.28.6.0)
==1136==    by 0x4E5EACE: _gnutls_recv_server_kx_message (in 
/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/lib/.libs/libgnutls.so.28.6.0)
==1136==    by 0x4E5C979: _gnutls_handshake_client (in 
/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/lib/.libs/libgnutls.so.28.6.0)
==1136==    by 0x4E5CCCF: gnutls_handshake (in 
/build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/lib/.libs/libgnutls.so.28.6.0)
==1136==    by 0x40180E: doit (in /build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/tests/mini-loss-time)
==1136==    by 0x401194: main (in /build/src/gnutls-3.0.13/tests/mini-loss-time)
==1136== 

any idea?

-Andy
ArchLinux



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]