Re: NXWEB 3.0 is out (adds SSL, http proxy, and even better performance)

[Marcel Wijnen]

Hi Yaroslav,

Since I'm trying to set nxweb up with ssl, I've configures with "./configure --with-gnutls". The configuration seems to work (all tests are ran and the configuration does not end with any failures). Then I make and sudo make install.

During this process I see that a key is generated and in the ssl folder I think that the key and certificate are present
/nxweb-3.0.1-dev/ssl/ca.cfg
/nxweb-3.0.1-dev/ssl/ca_cert.pem
/nxweb-3.0.1-dev/ssl/ca_key.pem
/nxweb-3.0.1-dev/ssl/dh.pem
/nxweb-3.0.1-dev/ssl/Makefile
/nxweb-3.0.1-dev/ssl/Makefile.am
/nxweb-3.0.1-dev/ssl/Makefile.in
/nxweb-3.0.1-dev/ssl/server.cfg
/nxweb-3.0.1-dev/ssl/server_cert.pem
/nxweb-3.0.1-dev/ssl/server_key.pem

When I run
./nxweb

I get the following output and error message
2012-06-25 01:07:00 [14276:0xb73788e0]: nxweb binding :8055 for http
2012-06-25 01:07:00 [14276:0xb73788e0]: nxweb binding :8056 for https
2012-06-25 01:07:00 [14276:0xb73788e0]: No certificate or key were found

Is there something trivial that I've forgotten to do here? Should I use any flags or do some additional configuration?

Could you help me out on this? Thanks in advance.

Best,
Marcel

 

On Sunday, April 1, 2012 9:11:46 PM UTC+2, Yaroslav wrote:

Hi Nikos,

That's good. Thank you very much for the reference.

http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-benchmark-round2.html

Have you seen those benchmarks? There was no GnuTLS tested but now I think it could be. Do you happen to know the author?

Yaroslav

On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos  wrote:

On 01/27/2012 08:52 PM, Yaroslav wrote:

> I'd be happy if somene could do independent benchmarks of nxweb on
> different hardware. So that we know for sure that it is all true :)

Hello Yaroslav,
 I've done benchmarks on a small system and pretty much verify your
results. I've put at:

http://nikmav.blogspot.com/2012/04/in-some-embedded-systems-space-may.html

regards,
Nikos

PS. I've modified httpress to print "rps" as floating point, because the
numbers were really small for this system.