[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documentation on W32
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Documentation on W32 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:49:32 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:18:48 +0200
> From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Is there any reason for not using mingw64-32 instead?
Why would a package force its users into using only one particular
brand of runtime?
- Documentation on W32, LRN, 2012/09/11
- Re: Documentation on W32, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/09/12
- Re: Documentation on W32, LRN, 2012/09/13
- Re: Documentation on W32, LRN, 2012/09/13
- Re: Documentation on W32, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/09/15
- Re: Documentation on W32, LRN, 2012/09/15
- Re: Documentation on W32, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/09/15
- Re: Documentation on W32, LRN, 2012/09/15
- Re: Documentation on W32, Vincent Torri, 2012/09/15
- Re: Documentation on W32,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Documentation on W32, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/09/15
- Re: Documentation on W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/15
- Re: Documentation on W32, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/09/15
- Re: Documentation on W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/15
- Re: Documentation on W32, LRN, 2012/09/26
- Re: Documentation on W32, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2012/09/27
- Re: Documentation on W32, LRN, 2012/09/27
- Re: Documentation on W32, LRN, 2012/09/27
- Re: Documentation on W32, B. Scott Michel, 2012/09/26
- Re: Documentation on W32, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/09/27