Re: [Gomp-discuss] Mailing list

[Lars Segerlund]

 I agree on all points to everything said below ..

 / lars Segerlund.

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:17:34 -0400
Scott Robert Ladd <address@hidden> wrote:

> Biagio Lucini (by way of Biagio Lucini <address@hidden>) wrote:
> > My personal idea was to have a libgomp mailing list: the libraries are
> > logically separed from the compiler, maybe there are people who don't want 
> > to
> > receive all the technical e-mails about compilers and still keep an eye on
> > the development of the libraries.
> 
> libgomp is akin to libgfortran, being an integrated component of the 
> project); no one is going to be using libgomp by itself. So I don't 
> think we need a separate mailing list for it. Too many lists fragments 
> our focus, I think.
> 
> I do want to see us integrated with "regular" GCC development, as much 
> as possible. For matters purely gomp-related, we can manage a 
> address@hidden mailing list, and technical topics need to go into the 
> main GCC mailing lists.
> 
> We can always maintain this list for a short time in parallel (!), until 
> active folk know about the transition.
> 
> -- 
> Scott Robert Ladd
> site: http://www.coyotegulch.com
> blog: http://chaoticcoyote.blogspot.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss