Re: [Groff] Naming and position of *.man in the groff sources

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > This is a nice idea which I support.  You are invited to modify
> > the Makefiles accordingly.
> 
> No, thanx.  I prefer to move all man-pages into a single directory
> and adapt a single Makefile - using a "%.man :" tag or the like.

Maybe a misunderstanding.  The only rule to be adapted is `.man.n' in
`Makefile.comm'; all other `Makefile.sub' files only hold the names of
the man pages.  It shouldn't be a lot of work, but I don't have enough
time to do that by myself.


    Werner