Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info

[Ralph Corderoy]

Hi Stewart,

> > Having groff's documentation solely in groff would be an excellent
> > showcase of its abilities too.
> 
> better yet, hold it in DocBook and have it transformable into groff
> -- or whatever format you could want.

But it would remove one of the advantages, that of having a large,
idiomatic, not mechanically produced, work of groff included in the
distribution.

Also, I'd guess it would be easier to write examples of groff and the
matching output in groff.

Cheers,


Ralph.