[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] inconsistent synopsis for .MAILTO

From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [Groff] inconsistent synopsis for .MAILTO
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 11:09:12 +0000

Hi Werner,

> Overloading *might* work.  More important is consistency -- if I have
> a line-oriented macro foo, it's easy to remember that, say, <foo and
> foo> start and end the block-oriented versions.

As an aside, I'd vote against the < and > characters personally.  A S
and E suffix as in PS/PE, TS/TE, etc., would be fine.  <> just look
wrong in a troff macro name.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]