groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] \F request?


From: Colin Watson
Subject: Re: [Groff] \F request?
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:14:34 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:36:18PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:

> > Wouldn't \f[] and \F[] (an empty name) the better way to go.
> 
> An excellent idea!  I like this very much.  What do others think?  We
> could deprecate \fP in favor of the new syntax;

I'd veer away from the term "deprecate"; it implies it might be removed
in the future, and I think \fP is used in too many places to change. The
new syntax looks nice though.

-- 
Colin Watson                                  address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]