[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] \F request?
From: |
Colin Watson |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] \F request? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:14:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:36:18PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Wouldn't \f[] and \F[] (an empty name) the better way to go.
>
> An excellent idea! I like this very much. What do others think? We
> could deprecate \fP in favor of the new syntax;
I'd veer away from the term "deprecate"; it implies it might be removed
in the future, and I think \fP is used in too many places to change. The
new syntax looks nice though.
--
Colin Watson address@hidden
[Groff] \f[] implemented, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/04/14