Re: [Groff] Several file arguments to groff

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > Strictly speaking, this isn't true.  It's not unknown for there to
> > be multiple -m options: some macro packages are designed to work
> > together.  (Isn't -mpic there just for macro packages that don't
> > implement their own .PS and .PE?)

Yes.

> groff(1) describes -p for preprocessing with pic; -mpic is not
> mentioned in section "Macro Packages".

Omissions, omissions :-)

At least for the groff macro packages, I could introduce a
`this-is-a-major-macro-package' register which is set and tested by
all major macro packages to avoid e.g. loading of -mm and -ms at the
same time.


    Werner