[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Groff] Re: grohtml patches

From: Werner LEMBERG
Subject: Re: [Groff] Re: grohtml patches
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 22:50:16 +0100 (CET)

> > I don't think it is a good idea to add the `image_generator'
> > keyword to libgroff instead to the grohtml driver.  Which other
> > driver needs `image_generator'?  It seems best to me to move that
> > code to grohtml.
> ok, I'm not sure this is as easy as clean as it sounds. Maybe it
> would require quite a few support methods which effectively
> duplicate libgroff ?

Please explain.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]