[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] Re: some details missing from your patch
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
[Groff] Re: some details missing from your patch |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 21:11:25 +0100 (CET) |
A month ago I requested:
> > Please send me documentation diffs for the `.tag' and `.taga'
> > requests and the new -s option for grohtml.
In your answer you write:
[...]
The @code{tag} request emits a device special ditroff command
@emph{without} any space between itself and the next glyph.
Importantly it is also issued immediately after the previous troff
state (if any were emitted).
If I understand that correctly, tags issued with `.tag' are emitted
twice under particular circumstances, right? Can you provide a small
example?
The @code{taga} request delays emitting the special to the device
driver until the @code{troff} state changes. The @code{troff} state
is defined as the combination of:
As a continuation of my other mail to the list I wonder whether it
makes sense to have three actually tag commands:
.tag -- a new request which is really the equivalent to \X'...'.
.tag1 -- this is currently called .tag
.taga -- stays the same
What do you think?
Werner
- [Groff] Re: some details missing from your patch,
Werner LEMBERG <=