[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] PS printing
From: |
M Bianchi |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] PS printing |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Mar 2006 09:27:19 -0500 |
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 07:58:04AM +0300, Michail Vidiassov wrote:
> And the real question behind the poll is what version of the Adobe metrics
> to use - PostScript 2 or PostScript 3.
>
> If a considerable part of the grops output is handled by hardware,
> then we have to be conservative and use PS 2 fonts.
>
> On the other hand, PS 3 version has more glyphs and is likely to
> be supported by PS/PDF software (ghostscript, Acrobat Reader, host fonts)
> and some modern hardware.
OK. My take is that the question really is:
does the default groff change from PS 2 to PS 3 and cause things that
used to work "just like I wanted it to" change
or
does the default groff stay as it was and the PS 3 fonts only be set as
the default by those who know figure out to do it.
Is that what is being discussed?
My HP LaserJet 2200d uses HP PCL 6 and PostScript 2 emulation (as documented by
the test page). I'm not sure what that means since the file(1) command reports
my groff-generated *.ps files as
PostScript document text conforming at level 3.0
--
Mike Bianchi
Foveal Systems
973 822-2085 call to arrange Fax
address@hidden
http://www.AutoAuditorium.com
http://www.FovealMounts.com
- [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Michail Vidiassov, 2006/03/10
- [Groff] Re: PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/10
- RE: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Ted Harding, 2006/03/10
- Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/10
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing,
M Bianchi <=
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, M Bianchi, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/03/11
- Re: [Groff] PS printing, M Bianchi, 2006/03/11
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Clarke Echols, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Miklos Somogyi, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Deri James, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', Greg 'groggy' Lehey, 2006/03/10
Re: [Groff] PS printing - was Re: `Idot' vs. `Idotaccent', m hobgood, 2006/03/10