Re: [Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation

[Meg McRoberts]

Trust me, I'm no fan of WYSIWYG tools!  But while I would
rather write in raw *roff, I have to face the reality that
it's not easy to convince the "youngsters" that it's worth
the effort to learn it.  The nice thing about DocBook is that
it's possible for me to work in text format and other people
could work in WYSIWYG but we can all share the files...

Right now, I'm writing fairly technical documentation in Word,
of all things!  How awful is that, in so many ways!  ;-)

--- Zvezdan Petkovic <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 08:51:37PM -0800, Meg McRoberts wrote:
> > I'm not sure of the solution but it seems that, if they could write in
> > docbook, this opens the option of using an XML WYSIWYG editor if
> > necessary.
> 
> Which does not make the writing any faster.
> Picking one of 100+ tags from the menu is no fun.
> :-)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Groff mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
>