[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs
From: |
James Cloos |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:59:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "WL" == Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
WL> Th[e] [/uring] glyph is only contained in the URW fonts.
It would be useful were the \[] construct, if the NFC glyph is
unavailable but the NFD constituents are, to use the same mechanism
as \o'' to construct a fallback for the desired glyph.
Also, I see that preconv converts ů to \[u016F] and ů to u\[u030A],
neither of which fall back to overlaying \u and \ring when needed;
and the sequence fails to work even with a font like U-T.
(Had more to say, but have to run for a few hours....)
-JimC
--
James Cloos <address@hidden> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
- [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Ralph Corderoy, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs,
James Cloos <=
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/07/29
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel, 2013/07/29
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Deri James, 2013/07/29
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel, 2013/07/29
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, James Cloos, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] need help with composite glyphs, Heinz-Jürgen Oertel, 2013/07/28