[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] bad QE in -ms
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] bad QE in -ms |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Feb 2016 20:41:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.8.6-160-gb8bd20a |
Hi.
Carsten Kunze <address@hidden> wrote:
|Can we agree to commit this? (The patch is also added as a .gz file.)
|
|diff --git a/tmac/s.tmac b/tmac/s.tmac
|index cf0eca8..190ee11 100644
|--- a/tmac/s.tmac
|+++ b/tmac/s.tmac
|@@ -1298,6 +1298,10 @@ along with this program. If not, see <http://w\
|ww.gnu.org/licenses/>.
| .\}
| .el address@hidden unbalanced \\$0
| address@hidden
|+.if '\\$0'QE' \{\
|+. sp \\n[\\n[.ev]:PD]u
|+. ne \\n[PORPHANS]v+\\n(.Vu
|+.\}
| ..
| .de @QS
| .br
|@@ -1311,6 +1315,8 @@ along with this program. If not, see <http://ww\
|w.gnu.org/licenses/>.
| .nr \\n[.ev]:ri +\\n[QI]
| .nr \\n[.ev]:ai \\n[\\n[.ev]:PI]
| address@hidden
|+.sp \\n[\\n[.ev]:PD]u
|+.ne \\n[PORPHANS]v+\\n(.Vu
| ..
| .als @QE @RE
| .\" start boxed text
Disclaimer: i never have used ms nor have i ever looked into the
macros.
But of course i was interested in this and while i fully trust you
(i haven't even tried it) i think a better approach would be to
avoid the repititions. I saw you've copied+pasted the .sp / .ne
sequence from a par*start, so wouldn't it be better as attached?
What do you mean?
--steffen
carsten.diff
Description: Text Data