groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[groff] Forwarded: Re: placement of const is _not_ a matter of style ...


From: Mike Bianchi
Subject: [groff] Forwarded: Re: placement of const is _not_ a matter of style ...
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 13:36:44 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

I wrote:
        > > >>   const char *foo;
        > > >>   char const *foo;
        > 
        > No, those two have identical meaning.

        Not according to:
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Const_(computer_programming)
                              :
                              :

I was wrong.  Those two lines _are_ identical.
The example code I lifted even illustrated that.

        const int *ptrToConst;     //identical to: int const *ptrToConst,

My apologies to [groff].

((more to come))

-- 
 Mike Bianchi



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]