|
From: | Roy Fisher |
Subject: | Re: [groff] Fonts, PDF images, groff vs. heirloom troff |
Date: | Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:11:51 -0600 |
Hi Pierre-Jean, On 1/27/19 8:43 AM, Pierre-Jean Fichet wrote:
I agree. 32-bit Heirloom and the older versions of n-t-roff did have that characteristic.As far as I remember, on some paragraphs, the inter-word space is not regular, ie too high on some lines, which is not as pretty as it should be. That was years ago, when I was still using heirloom before switching to neatroff.
The changes that resulted from issue #22 were incorporated into n-t-roff last year, and it can now produce paragraphs as good as those of the leading commercial application, at least in my (possibly slightly biased) opinion. So, if you do decide to revisit n-t-roff and try out those new features, I think you might be pleasantly surprised. And if you find something that is odd or strange about them, please post it in #22 and I'll look into it.
It still uses output-line traps, though, which sounds like a deal-breaker for you. Output-line traps can be more intricate, but they do allow full-paragraph optimization instead of forcing sub-paragraph optimization.
Regards, Roy
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |