Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

[Hollis Blanchard]

On Jul 13, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> Marco Gerards wrote:
> > For which reason?
> >
> > But if it should be more precise, it should be a grub_uint64_t.
>
> If the architecture give us a 32 bit number, we won't invent the
> remaining 32 bits...

We don't invent them; they are 0.

-Hollis